<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What role for local food?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefireweed.com/2010/06/06/what-role-for-local-food/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefireweed.com/2010/06/06/what-role-for-local-food/</link>
	<description>Food for thought, for science, for art and for life.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: afghanistan food</title>
		<link>http://thefireweed.com/2010/06/06/what-role-for-local-food/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>afghanistan food</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefireweed.com/?p=208#comment-1011</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;afghanistan food...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]the Fireweed  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; What role for local food?[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>afghanistan food&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]the Fireweed  &raquo; Blog Archive   &raquo; What role for local food?[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: levolor</title>
		<link>http://thefireweed.com/2010/06/06/what-role-for-local-food/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>levolor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 22:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefireweed.com/?p=208#comment-452</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it is the eternal physicist in me, but it does seem as though eventually we will be able to quantify all energies, inputs and outputs of specific systems. The accumulation of matter follows finite rules. What would you say to a proposal that features box A that needs N amount of input of X type of energy to produce Y usable food matter, with all byproducts accounted? Ever the agrarian... just following the water=life, energy=agriculture idea to a feasible, if hopeful, conclusion of positive net effect. I imagine a fully functional, foolproof "Greenhouse" in every back yard in the world that produces a significant % of daily calories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it is the eternal physicist in me, but it does seem as though eventually we will be able to quantify all energies, inputs and outputs of specific systems. The accumulation of matter follows finite rules. What would you say to a proposal that features box A that needs N amount of input of X type of energy to produce Y usable food matter, with all byproducts accounted? Ever the agrarian&#8230; just following the water=life, energy=agriculture idea to a feasible, if hopeful, conclusion of positive net effect. I imagine a fully functional, foolproof &#8220;Greenhouse&#8221; in every back yard in the world that produces a significant % of daily calories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

